THE EURASIAN RACE
by Constantin von Hoffmeister
The Eurasian race is the most progressive race. Since all
civilization originated on the Eurasian continent, through the
collective will of the blood of the Eurasian peoples, one can clearly
establish that the Eurasians, as a whole, constitute one race. This
race is divided into several subraces, for example the Nordic (Aryan)
one, the Semitic one, the Turkic one, the Oriental one. Of course,
one also has to understand that the Eurasian root race is the
Hyperborean one. Without the strident aggressiveness of the Nordic
subrace, the Eurasian race would not be where it ended up - on top of
the human pyramid. Hence, the Nordic subrace is the one that
naturally should be the vanguard of Eurasia in the future, as it has
been in the past. Joseph Stalin acknowledged this when he said (in a
speech in the Kremlin to commanders of the Red Army on May 24,
1945), "Most of all, I drink to the health of the Russian nation
because it is the preeminent nation of all the nations of the Soviet
Union." Since the Russian people (nation) are a part of the Nordic
subrace and the Soviet Union was the epitomical homeland of the
Eurasian race, it is obvious that Stalin understood the vanguard role
that the Nordic subrace plays in Eurasia.
One should not for one moment suppose that negroes make up a
progressive race. Even Karl Marx himself agreed on this point, as is
evident in his views on slavery: "As for slavery, there is no need
for me to speak of its bad aspects. The only thing requiring
explanation is the good side of slavery. I do not mean indirect
slavery, the slavery of proletariat; I mean direct slavery, the
slavery of the Blacks in Surinam, in Brazil, in the southern regions
of North America. ... Slavery is therefore an economic category of
paramount importance. Without slavery, North America, the most
progressive nation, would be transformed into a patriarchal country."
(from a letter to Pavel Vasilyevich Annenkov, 1846) Obviously, Marx
argues that the enslavement of negroes was a prerequisite for the
emancipation of a predominantly White AmeriKa. Without the backs of
negroes on which to unload labor, White American men would be forced
to toil unnecessarily. White American women would thus be deprived of
the chance to exert an influence equal to that of the men. Without
the negroes' work, women would have to stay at home and take care of
the households themselves, instead of being productive in positions
that would enable them to realize a communal way of life. Through the
progressive element of slavery, women were freed from the shackles of
their social roles as housewives and property of working men.
This view is decidedly materialist in that it acknowledges the
evolutionary hierarchy that divides humanity into higher and lower
races. It is definitely non-Marxist behavior to pretend that all
races are equal. Since Marx was a Lamarckian, meaning he believed
that acquired traits were inherited, it is not surprising that he
held views that many leftist Communists would consider "racist." In
contrast to the Trotskyite multiculturalist nonsense, the Soviet
Union made great advances in racial science, in part influenced by
the revolutionary breakthroughs of the Third Reich in this field.
The only race that can be considered a "root race" is the Nordic
subrace. It was the Nordic subrace that was directly responsible for
the greatest and most original achievements in Eurasian history. The
Nordic subrace managed to infiltrate the other subraces' social
strata and assume leadership positions in their respective societies.
The red-haired mummies in China are but one example of the Nordic
legacy that was behind the foundation of all great civilizational
achievements on the Eurasian continent. The Nordic subrace is a "root
race" because at its roots, deep down and far back in time, Eurasia
owes its greatness exclusively to Nordic blood and genius.
the ideal worker in the Soviet Union
the Nordic worker
evident in sculptures throughout the former
"his shield a weapon of glory"
"is he a person or a nation of workers?"
Libertarian free White AmeriKa as the vanguard in action
Nordic settlers frontiered
de-Indianized the West
Soviet enlightened Russia the brother brooding
CAPTAIN AMERICA asks CAPTAIN RUSSIA:
"Where is the line of demarcation?"
A bridge across the Bering Strait!
The Bloody Baron: Baron von Ungern-Sternberg, who viewed himself as
the reincarnation of Genghis Khan, hated Bolsheviks and Jews equally.
He equated the two. He killed, tortured and mutilated countless
innocent Bolsheviks and Jews. Nevertheless, he wanted to create a
Eurasian empire, a Buddhist empire with Nordic Russians as the ruling
class. It is ironic that the very people he despised (Bolsheviks and
Jews) were able to create the very empire that he failed to create.
The Bloody Baron: warrior Buddhist, follower of the 16th Path of
Oblivion, mad, on fire. An Aryan soul in search of power. A will to
solve, to obliterate to build, to drink to deny. Had cripples killed
so that they could be reincarnated whole again.
While today Persia continues to be occupied by Islam, von Ungern-
Sternberg wanted to liberate the peasants of Russia from the Semitic
infection they suffered from, namely Orthodoxy. Buddhism, an ancient
Aryan religion (before the Dalai Lamas perverted and mongrelized it),
would have been able to repurify the healthy Nordic instincts within
the Eurasian landmass. The Bolsheviks were also quite successful in
eradicating the disease of Orthodoxy, albeit not in the noble way
that von Ungern-Sternberg envisioned. European atheism is Aryan
Buddhism minus the cosmic spirit of belonging.
While contemporary Muslim savages blow up statues of the great Aryan
sage, von Ungern-Sternberg wanted to blow up shrines of materialism
and replace them with sanctified temples where worship of the
umpteenth faces of the Bhudda would have been mandatory.